VerdictLab

biBERK vs Thimble: Which Is Better?

Berkshire Hathaway's direct annual carrier versus the app that sells coverage by the hour. Six rounds. Real numbers. One honest scorecard.

biBERKWinner
biBERK
7.1
Good
3 of 6 rounds
vs
Thimble
Thimble
6.5
Fair
2 of 6 rounds

The verdict

biBERK takes it, 3–2 on rounds.

There's no universal winner — biBERK and Thimble are built for opposite rhythms of work, so match the policy structure to the shape of your actual calendar.

Choose biBERK if…

  • • You work continuously all year and want one flat, predictable annual premium
  • • You want a single Berkshire-backed carrier accountable for the whole policy

Choose Thimble if…

  • • You work in bursts — events, gigs, or seasonal jobs with real gaps between them
  • • You regularly need to prove coverage fast with an on-demand certificate

Round by round

  1. Round 1Policy Duration & FlexibilityThimble wins
    biBERK5/10

    12-month terms

    Conventional annual policy structure, no short-duration option

    • Right structure for continuous, year-round operation
    • No way to buy coverage for a single job or day

    Source: biBERK dossier

    Thimble10/10

    1 hour minimum

    Buy by the hour, day, week or month — pay only for the time you're exposed

    • Zero wasted premium between gigs
    • Ideal for one-off gigs like weddings or weekend jobs

    Source: Thimble dossier

    So this round goes to Thimble on flexibility.

  2. Round 2Who Actually Underwrites the PolicybiBERK wins
    biBERK9/10

    A++ (Superior)

    Berkshire Hathaway subsidiaries — the highest AM Best rating that exists

    • Berkshire's insurance arm paid ~$62B in claims in 2025
    • One company sells the policy and pays the claim — no partner to route to

    Source: AM Best ratings (biBERK dossier)

    Thimble5/10

    MGA, not a carrier

    Partner carriers like Markel and Employers underwrite, rated A- or higher

    • Backed by Arch Capital since the 2023 acquisition
    • No AM Best rating of its own

    Source: Thimble dossier

    So this round goes to biBERK, thanks to clear backing and one-stop claims handling.

  3. Round 3Certificates of Insurance On DemandThimble wins
    biBERK5/10

    Standing annual coverage

    Online policy management, but not built for ad-hoc per-job certificates

    • Self-serve portal lets you pull your own documentation online
    • Not built for spinning up a fresh certificate per job

    Source: biBERK dossier

    Thimble9/10

    ~4.6/5

    Trustpilot rating across 1,200+ reviews — strong on the buying/certificate experience

    • Certificates generated and shared on demand, mid-job
    • Generate certificates directly from the app, no waiting on an agent

    Source: Thimble dossier (Trustpilot)

    Round to Thimble on that. Faster, on-demand certificates just make life easier out there.

  4. Round 4Claims & Customer ServicebiBERK wins
    biBERK6/10

    One carrier handles the whole claim

    • Single accountable carrier for every claim
    • Higher-than-expected regulator complaint volume
    Thimble5/10

    Claims routed to the underwriting partner

    • Backed by underwriting partners rated A- or higher by AM Best
    • Claims handled by whichever partner carrier wrote the policy

    Round goes to biBERK on accountability.

  5. Round 5The Real Year-Round MathbiBERK wins
    biBERK8/10

    ~$105/mo avg

    Flat annual pricing; GL from ~$30/mo for low-hazard businesses

    • Predictable cost regardless of how many weeks you work
    • One premium, twelve months, done

    Source: biBERK dossier (MoneyGeek 2026)

    Thimble6/10

    from $17/mo

    Cheapest per gig, but can exceed annual pricing if stacked all year

    • Unbeatable for occasional, short-duration work
    • Can cost more per unit of time than an annual policy

    Source: Thimble dossier

    Round to Thimble — for the freelancer who works in fits and starts.

  6. Round 6Who Each One Was Built ForTie
    biBERK8/10

    Year-round fit

    Continuous annual coverage for a business that operates every week

    • Built for consultants, contractors and office-based firms with no off-season
    • No need to re-shop coverage every few months

    Source: biBERK dossier

    Thimble8/10

    170,000+ policies

    Delivered to gig and short-duration businesses across ~130 professions since 2018

    • Purpose-built for burst, on-and-off schedules
    • Serves ~130 different professions in the gig/short-duration space

    Source: Thimble dossier

    So this round goes to Thimble.

Which one is for you?

Wedding photographer who shoots a dozen weekends a year

→ Thimble · Paying only for event days plus on-demand certificates beats a full annual premium for occasional work.

Pop-up vendor or one-off event operator

→ Thimble · Thimble can cover a single day or event, exactly matching a short, defined exposure.

Consultant or freelancer working full-time all year

→ biBERK · Year-round work makes biBERK's flat annual GL and E&O cheaper than stacking short policies.

Owner who wants a single accountable carrier if a claim goes wrong

→ biBERK · biBERK is one carrier end-to-end; Thimble routes claims to an underwriting partner.

Side by side

biBERKBest for financial strengthbiBERK
Overall score
7.1
Best
6.5
Price
See price
See price
Financial Strength
9.5
—
Buying Experience
8.0
9.0
Pricing & Affordability
8.5
8.0
Head-to-head findings
Financial Strength
A++ (Superior)
—
Buying Experience
Fully self-serve, every line
Certificate in minutes
Pricing & Affordability
~$105/mo
~$94/mo
Record
Head-to-head record
5–2
1–6
Head-to-heads won
71 %
14 %
Rounds won
55 %
38 %
Pros
  • Instant online quote-and-bind, no agent required
  • Backed by Berkshire, which paid ~$62B in claims in 2025
  • AM Best's single highest financial-strength grade available
  • All essentials from one A++-backed carrier
  • No premium wasted between jobs
  • Instant certificate for a single hour, day, or event
  • Deep enough for straightforward freelance risk across ~130 professions
  • No agent required at any point
Cons
  • No local agent relationship if you want one
  • Higher-than-expected state regulator complaint volume relative to market share (NerdWallet)
  • Long hold times and AI phone systems reported
  • No cyber, management liability or group benefits
  • No cyber, EPLI, workers' comp or agribusiness lines
  • Zero coverage for these specialized risks
  • Not built for larger or more complex risk profiles
  • Claims handled by the underwriting partner, not Thimble
Add a third option to this comparison →

More business insurers match-ups